For context I will copy some of the actual responses the OP seems to have problems with, and the original claims I responded to, focussed on the ones I think are relevant to the request (the first belongs to a different post than the rest, but was also quoted in this ban request against me):
you are the FANBOY here defending undefendable.
I only defend reason. You want to state something else about me? or about what you claim that I think? Because those are the same arguments you were using, and they did still not magically turn themselves into valid ones.
Please dont psych I, psyche yourself first. Or try it on your momma. End of comm.
And when the arguments fail to convince, you go into personal attacks.
Ignoring the arguments to attack the person who makes them, does very little but showing the weakness of your reasons.
Relax,nobody is paying for your private practice.
It is called using reasons and counter examples to argue a position. This is what honest arguments do.
I dont need to be paid to argue honestly, I do it for free, thank you very much.
I am kindly requesting admins to tell Corto this is not psyche evaluation forum.
If you think logic arguments have no place in an honest conversation, is up to you.
I could kindly tell them to not allow people to use the mother of others in their posts, But im not going to. I address arguments,
See. You need to get a help. I hope you get it before to late. You can’t see what you are doing. I hope you are not so alone at rl with this problem, if so the help could arrive late maybe never.
Thank you very much for caring about my health. Im perfectly fine, thank you for your concern.
Can @ oSiyeza get a public warning for psychoanalisys of other people
I don’t think you know what psychoanalysis is. I had not even once made personal comments on others, but instead explained why you should not do that.
get an opinion of a doctor to be sure
I can and I will also say when you attack me instead of attacking my arguments that you are making an ad-hominem attack which is another fallacy, and another invalid way to argue.
I argue that all the personal attacks, all claims about mental health, and all name-calling come in the opposite direction of the one the author of request is claiming.
PS:

careless Ethiopian
I understand this is a grammar mistake, and the author of the request was not making a racial claim.