feedback for developers

[walan]

@helstads_dog

I want to immediately thank the developers for such a pleasant game in my favorite area of ​​games.

A game with huge capabilities and I see will more of them appear.

At this point I would also like to thank the devs! This game can still develop into a masterpiece, depending on which direction it continues …

@helstads_dog

if you compare the game with chess, then all soldiers are queens))

There are many contributions to this. Have you ever looked into this threads?

Nerf everything - #53 by walan

To prevent alpha-strikes

@helstads_dog

And then the question is, what concept did the developers put into the game?

a. fast battle, that is, the correct placement of fighters, a shot is a corpse, a battle takes 2-3 rounds. At the moment, the game is just that. a sandbox in which you choose how to quickly kill these stupid enemies. and the enemies do not have time to do anything.

and it quickly gets boring, as the player has a clear advantage, a jerk, a quick stripping and so on. Enemies have few lives and skills to successfully confront the player.

b. or positional war with breakthroughs while weakening the enemy. By the way, this is exactly how it turns out at the beginning of the game, while the team is still weak and has few skills. and it is interesting. strong opponents who do not die with one poke in one round. the need to move from the flanks, hiding soldiers in shelters. I certainly like the second option (strong tactics), when armor matters both on the enemy and on soldiers.

I would also be interested in what the goal of the devs is.

@helstads_dog

I certainly like the second option (strong tactics), when armor matters both on the enemy and on soldiers.

I see it the same way