Cthullu Legend Feedback (full campaign)

Phoenix Point Game Feedback
3

I think that I agree with all your comments.

I would add that now teams of soldiers don’t need to be as big. At the beginning, 4 in a group seemed enough because the Pandorans are easier to dispatch.

Also the new base system with radar scanners sometimes means that one can’t do important diplomatic faction missions. A lack of resources to open up and upgrade or build facilities in certain areas has meant that I couldn’t get lots of nice tech including food production. Perhaps that is intentional to force more raids on the factions? But I did find myself often waiting for the next mission because of too few resources and not having access to parts of the globe. That’s a big change for the game - waiting for events to happen that are beyond my control!

1 Like
4

I think they are all on point.
-Resources are very low that you can’t even make armors to your recruits.
-Inventory story about you are transferring items but no because you did not have enough time is very annoying. Why do you let us transfer at first place?
-Melee is very weak in the game, for you and for enemy. Both are dying and the result is sad, because it’s not worth it.
-Bases you repaired but not energized rooms is another bad thing.
-For research, yes, it’s way easier to do the diplomatic missions rather then trying to steal techs.

Game is great, just cries for some more tweaks to be much more better.

5

Good feedback where I agree on most things. Just some comments:

It will be changed by some degree.

Issue is the power level of soldiers which I suppose won’t be addressed soon enough.

Increasing number of enemies is not a good way in my opinion. They just should get tougher instead of numerous. And player power should decrease to make things more interesting tactically instead of shooting the ducks with super skills.

Hehe. :slight_smile:

2 Likes
6

The issue with making the Pandorans tougher instead of more numerous is that that encourages ‘bullet sponge’ style combat where you have soldiers spending action after action emptying magazines into the things, which makes already-long and already-slow combats even slower and longer. Killing high-HP enemies like Sirens and Chirons is enough of a chore as it is – making it take even longer won’t improve things.

I don’t think I ever played a mission and thought “these enemies have too little HP, I wish I was spending more time shooting them”. The problem is that most enemies aren’t a threat – melee Arthrons can’t reach your guys, and most other enemies don’t have the hitting power to be really scary. The big exception are enemies with high-damage long-range piercing weapons like sniper rifles, but they don’t come in large enough numbers to be dangerous most of the time.

Just adding more HP to enemies without also rebalancing other things will NOT improve the campaign, it’ll probably make it worse. Yes, it’d increase the difficulty, but it’d make the grindy parts even grindier, and that’s the biggest problem with Phoenix Point right now.

3 Likes
7

but tougher enemies would be able to use their abilities. :wink: You wouldn’t be able to take them down like right now. So it would give them a chance to fight. And believe me it works like that - I have seen such change in one of the test builds. Yes enemies are then bullet sponges, but they actually pose a threat.

About the case of combats being slower and longer… If number of enemies wouldn’t increase, and in some cases even decrease, then I don’t think it would take more time and won’t increase grind of the whole campaign.

Of course there is also aspect of how many missions whole campaign should involve, but that is the case already discussed within community council. Many agree that there is too much of it and it is too repetitive. What will come out of these discussions - we will see.

1 Like
8

I agree higher HP totals/lower soldier damage would make combat harder, but I’m not sure it’d make it more fun. It’d encourage very slow/cautious styles of play where you stay at range and let the Pandorans trickle in one at a time while you focus-fire them down. This is already the safest/most reliable way to fight – you just camp out in your starting zone, wait for the enemies to come to you, and kill them one by one.

The most fun combats I’ve had have generally been ones where I was swarmed with LOTS of enemies, and actually had to make hard decisions about where to focus my attacks and which Pandorans I had to leave alone for a turn or two. E.g. the final mission, or Citadel assaults where the Scylla rushes you along with lots of other enemies. Maybe you’re right and boosting HP would make fights feel more like that, but I’m not sure.

1 Like
9

Agree with pretty much all the points made by the OP. In particular the issue about late-game speed-run lair raids particularly resonates - I’m just challenging myself to se how quickly/efficiently I can clear each lair type (Nests done turn 1, Lairs turn 2, Citadels not counted but I think I did one in 3 turns). This is Legendary mode. I don’t have a quick suggestion but clearly a simple method would be to start ramping up the Panda numbers a lot… getting swarmed… I won’t mind that as long as I am not having to continuously clear new ones taking a hour each time. Maybe a new large Panda which is more of a direct attacker than a launch Chiron - a quad mounted machine gun Chiron like a M16 half-track perhaps? :wink:

How about being able to ‘raid’ previously destroyed Havens to search for left over supplies (but remove the obvious box highlights as per normal supply runs) as a balance to trading?

One change I would definitely suggest is stopping the Nest raid as soon as the two target Pandas (forgot name) are dead. Instead I should have to safely extract the team afterwards as per the other raids.

I really love the early to mid game at the moment. Late game still needs some extra lovin’ maybe to avoid ‘grind’… again not a problem unique to PP by any means and I really like that things are still developing. I hope the games sales are going strong.

2 Likes
10

I always thought PP would begin with our operatives just being a ragtag group of men and women answering the Project’s call, and the tutorial would have you getting developing armour and weapons, which would be a cool way to introduce research and manufacture, and soldiers would have problems fighting melee pandorans because they would have such weak weapons. For an armed group that went into hiding for so long, PP’s troops carry very expensive military gear

2 Likes
11

The problem is that once you learn how to take advantage of AoE attacks and things like Rapid Clearance, and provoking panic, past some point more enemies make the game easier, not harder. For example, the Gatekeepers in the last mission are cannon fodder. You can easily erase most of them in a first strike and panic the rest.

12

I think that’s more because the panic system is just broken at the moment due to how crude it is. The flat Will penalty for losses means that a 4 man squad losing 50% of their members will take -6 will each (and will keep on fighting), while a 20 man squad losing 25% of their members will take -15 will each (and will probably all panic immediately).

This produces really silly results where you do a haven defence and 3 civilians get killed in a building on the other side of the map and suddenly your team are panicking and running around like headless chickens, wheras having your squad leader shot through the head right next to them makes them shrug and go ‘eh, I’m fine’.

8 Likes
13

then maybe it would be better just decreasing WP penalty for kills Pandas get…

1 Like
14

I agree.
More opponents lead to even more clicks (PP has already too many clicks with repeatable use of skills and also confirming). In addition, more opponents mean more time spent on the opponent’s turn.
Both together lead to a less dynamic game and therefore not very popular for the masses.

2 Likes
15

So I did what I said I wouldn’t do - play before the new DLC comes out. Wanted to briefly check in on Cthullu update so I would have a better idea of some of the new mechanics. Unfortunately, it has eaten up a bit of time and I have some thoughts about what you wrote. I agree with most of your points.
As I frequently do, I will start a new campaign with normal difficulty when there is new stuff to learn. I will figure out the new mechanics then start a new game on the highest setting. So, I ended up playing quite a bit on normal difficulty, and found that the tactical game is really easy. Before you hit a difficulty wall and now it is so gradual that there is basically no challenge. I haven’t reached the point where the enemy has Scylla’s but am seeing Sirens and different types of Chirons. They aren’t really a threat. My B team with beginning tech and mid levels was able to easily defeat a group with two Chirons and a Siren. This should be harder as these enemy’s have a lot of skills and HP’s but still can’t really penetrate a slow, methodical approach. The only thing that might have disrupted my methodical grinding were the fire chirons and even this did little, as it’s easy to spread out and mitigate the impact. So, something needs to change.
Also, the high price of everything really does make it grindy, even on normal. Can’t imagine how much worse that will be on Legend. Not sure about the best way too fix this, but someone else mentioned the high cost of bases as being a big obstacle. The price should be lower or you don’t have pay so much for repairs. Also, basic armor is a little too expensive, IMO.
I do like the changes to skills like Dash to make it not so gamebreaking (still very powerful).
I agree with you about the UI tweeks. The first scavenger mission I lost at least 3 resource packs that I thought I picked up (wasn’t exactly sure). I didn’t even notice until the mission ended and I am thinking I got like 8 resource packs and ended up with 4. I should have been paying attention to the counter. Sadly, I didn’t even figure out what was happening until the 3rd scavenger mission! Made me feel like a total noob.
This just shows that there is more work to do!
Like you, still enjoying and getting excited for the new DLC.

16

I’m not against giving a pass to WP penalties/rewards for deaths/killing.

Actually, I suggest lowering all of them by 1, so that it’s not so easy to use the skill your spent the WPs on to recover them.

What do you think?

Personally, I don’t like dealing with mobs of enemies, and I don’t think that it fits Phoenix Point thematically either. I would rather see fewer enemies with more non-lethal abilities, and a player with much more limited capabilities as well.

5 Likes
17

I can’t agree more here.

18

Looking at the patch notes for the next patch necronomicon, do you think it will address these issues?

19

I’m not sure. The lowered amount of Haven defences sounds good, but I’m worried that they’re not doing anything about the issues with the economy.

The biggest problem with PP at the moment, IMO, is that to progress you have to spend a lot of time doing low-risk low-reward repetitive tasks that are fun the first time but get pretty tedious by the 20th or 30th time. After a while it feels like you’re doing basically the same small set of missions and tasks over and over again.

I still enjoy the game, but I think this is what’s currently stopping it from being really successful. It’s supposed to be a Lovecraftian military-horror thriller, but by the time you get to mid-late game you’re spending most of your time doing boring stuff to earn resources.

1 Like
20

I came back to play Cthullu since I read there were big changes from the time I gave up playing the game (way back before the first DLC released).

Unlike everyone else in this thread, I am a casual player and I am not a tactical and strategic genius that can take a naked 4 man team with combat knives and kill a Scylla, then walk away wearing new suits of armor and using BFGs made out of reconditioned Scylla parts.

I find NORMAL mode challenging and tough and I found that to still be true when I played this time. Matter of fact, I restarted down on ROOKIE and still find it challenging Mid to Late game. Those are more my speed - Where I can walk away due to real life interruptions and come back and not have to worry about having forgotten some minor part of the combat where on higher difficulties that would make me wipe the team.

I see everyone talking about how easy Legend is and it just totally destroys me when I tried it, Multiple times. So, whatever changes are being considered - please keep in mind those of who don’t play/aren’t good on those high levels.

I’d played games where things were balanced from the top down and found the easiest levels still so difficult I decided to save myself the stress.

comment wise - I’m not a fan of all the changes, like the food production lockout, the endless Mobs on some maps or having to get your men to extraction points after completing the mission objective. Trading is still painfully grindy like other aspects of the game, including some of the constant haven missions and nests/lairs.

Overall though, it’s a huge improvement since the first iteration of the game.

I’m not sure what I think about the way bases are done now. They seem to get very expensive, very fast. You pay to activate them and they pay to repair them and the pay more to get the things you need in them…money sinks when money is already very tight.

I feel like Dash, Rage Burst and Marked for Death have been over-nerfed. Especially RB and MoD considering they are level 7 abilities.

Still, better balanced and more fun than the last time I played.

4 Likes
21

Very good points by the OP - some of them are reported on Canny but here the OP laid them out in a great way and the text became a very good overall of cthulhu too.

I’m a veteran of this type of game and play them since the original xcom, but I also don’t have much time to play anymore. So I play on veteran and in that difficulty resources are really scarce for me, even when I didn’t activate many bases. I usually take a LOT of real-life time to get to the end of a campaign - I didn’t even totally finish a single campaign because major patches or DLC arrive before I can and its best to start over… SO that’s why I hate anything grindy and do hope the team can get around this problem soon.

I love the game and try to follow up a bit here (more on canny as it takes less time) and also to play a bit when a major overhaul comes. I wish I could take a peek in the council board just to know which direction is being taken!

1 Like
22

Read guide written by Voland. It should help you understand underlying mechanics and take advantage of what you can get in the game.

1 Like