# City on a Hill, defenders are too many **URL:** \ **Category:** Game Feedback\ **Created:** [July 3, 2020, 8:06pm UTC](https://forums.snapshotgames.com/t/city-on-a-hill-defenders-are-too-many/10952 "2020-07-03T20:06:19Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 3
**Author:** ![noStas](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/forums.snapshotgames.com/nostas/32/2001_2.png) [@noStas](https://forums.snapshotgames.com/u/noStas)\ **Post date:** [July 4, 2020, 10:54am UTC](https://forums.snapshotgames.com/t/city-on-a-hill-defenders-are-too-many/10952/3 "2020-07-04T10:54:40Z")
What do you think would be possible if everything was like this? > [@Attempting a realistic/detailed representation of missions](https://forums.snapshotgames.com/t/attempting-a-realistic-detailed-representation-of-missions/10882): > > Haven Defense Attack of monsters / enemies on several structures at once (2-3 Haven tiles) The player himself chooses the goal and the reward: Protect the key objects of 5-7 turns (you can choose immediately available soldier-defenders with deduction of resources). - Power Generator, mid reward Eliminate enemy forces with the key boss (random defenders). - Training center, high reward Eliminate enemy forces (without the participation of internal defenders). - Plantations, low reward Explains… --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.snapshotgames.com/t/city-on-a-hill-defenders-are-too-many/10952)._